Article 1 of 3
Why Wealthy Families Invest in Direct Private Equity: A Comprehensive Guide
Investing in direct private equity means acquiring direct stakes in privately held companies without going through a fund. In recent years, this strategy has become a central component of the portfolios of the most sophisticated family offices. This article explores why, and what distinguishes those who do it well from those who do it poorly.
What Is Direct Private Equity and How Does It Differ from a Fund?
When discussing private equity investment, the most important distinction is not between sectors or geographies: it is between indirect investment through a fund and direct investment in a privately held company.
In a traditional private equity fund, the investor delegates everything: opportunity selection, governance, operational management and exit timing. In return, the investor benefits from diversification and access to professional expertise. In direct private equity, or direct investing, the investor acquires a stake directly in an individual company, with active involvement in governance and value creation.
According to the UBS Global Family Office Report 2025, private equity is now the leading alternative asset class for wealthy entrepreneurial families, with an average allocation of 21% of their overall portfolios. Of this allocation, more than 40% now consists of direct investments, a proportion that has grown substantially over the past decade and is expected to continue increasing.
Direct private equity is not simply a way to seek higher returns. It is a capital allocation model that enables direct strategic control, immediate access to value creation and the full leveraging of a family office's entrepreneurial know-how.
The Five Structural Drivers Behind Family Offices' Growing Interest in Direct Investing
1. The Search for Returns Uncorrelated with Public Markets
The macroeconomic environment of recent years has reshaped the conditions under which wealth is managed. Structurally higher interest rates, declining expected real returns and increasingly efficient equity markets make it progressively more difficult to generate adequate returns through a traditional portfolio of listed equities and bonds.
Private markets, and direct private equity in particular, offer a different return profile, less dependent on market beta and more closely linked to operational execution, the quality of governance and the industrial transformation of the target company. For family offices, this diversification benefit has a strategic value that goes beyond expected returns alone.
2. Access to the Private Economy: Where Most Value Is Created
Over the past twenty years, a major structural trend has emerged: companies are remaining privately held for significantly longer than in the past. The phase of greatest growth acceleration, historically responsible for generating the most significant returns for investors, now takes place before any IPO or public listing.
Investing directly in privately held companies means participating in these growth phases, which public markets can no longer capture. For a family office with a long-term investment horizon, this is not speculation: it is access to real value that would otherwise remain outside the portfolio.
3. Strategic Control: A Priority for Entrepreneurial Families
For many entrepreneurial families that have built their wealth through direct ownership and control of a business, fully delegating investment management to a fund creates a difficult tension: it requires complete trust in a process over which they have only limited control.
Direct investing fundamentally changes this dynamic. Investors can directly influence governance, capital structure, management incentives, resource allocation and growth strategy. This alignment between the investment model and an entrepreneurial culture is often the decisive factor in choosing direct private equity.
4. The Information Advantage in Areas of Sector Expertise
Family offices with industrial roots have accumulated deep knowledge of specific sectors over the years: manufacturing, fashion, technology, logistics, food and beverage, and healthcare. This sector expertise translates into analytical capabilities that are difficult for generalist investors to replicate.
In the European lower-middle market, where information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders remains significant, sector specialisation can translate into privileged access to off-market deal flow, an understanding of competitive dynamics and the ability to identify opportunities not yet visible to competitors. This is a tangible competitive advantage, not merely a theoretical one.
5. Patient Capital as a Structural Advantage
Institutional private equity funds operate under strict time constraints: fundraising, capital deployment and exit within a predefined timeframe that typically does not exceed ten years. This creates structural tensions with the reality of certain companies, which may need more time to complete their industrial transformation.
Family capital is not subject to this constraint. The time flexibility of a family office, its ability to hold a position for twelve, fifteen or more years if the investment thesis justifies it, is not passivity. It is a genuine competitive advantage that allows long-term growth to take precedence over the pressure to deliver short-term returns.
Direct Private Equity and the Wealth Portfolio: The Right Questions to Ask Before Investing
Before allocating capital to direct private equity, a family office should clearly answer a series of preliminary questions: What percentage of the family's wealth can be committed for seven to ten years without creating liquidity pressures? In which industrial sector does the family possess proprietary expertise that can translate into a competitive advantage in analysing and managing the investment? Is there a structured process for assessing opportunities, or will investments be pursued on an opportunistic basis?
Direct private equity is not an asset class suited to every portfolio, nor to every stage in the life of a family office. It is a powerful instrument, but its effectiveness depends almost entirely on the quality of the process through which it is deployed.
In the second article of this series, we examine the specific risks of direct investing in detail: why this asset class introduces significantly greater levels of complexity than traditional investments, and the pitfalls into which even the most experienced investors tend to fall.
Next article:
Risks of Direct Private Equity: illiquidity, return dispersion and governance misalignment, what can go wrong and why it happens more often than one might think.